§132
希求法未来 (目次)
- 128. 概説
- 129. ピンダロスで初めて使われた希求法未来
- 130. ὅπωςに導かれる努力などを意味する目的節における希求法未来
- 131. μήやὅπως μήを伴って危惧を表わす動詞に続く希求法未来の例
- 132. 純粋に動作の目的を表わす節ではプラトン『国家』による1例を除いて希求法未来が使われた例がないこと
- 133. 直説法未来と同様に、希求法未来でもἵναを取った例はないこと
- 134. 過去時称に続く目的節で希求法未来が稀に使われる例
英語原文
No case is quoted of the future optative in a pure final clause, except a peculiar one with μή in Plat. Rep. 393 E : Ἀγαμέμνων ἠγρίαινεν, ἐντελλόμενος νῦν τε ἀπιέναι καὶ αὖθις μὴ ἐλθεῖν, μὴ αὐτῷ τό τε σκῆπτρον καὶ τὰ τοῦ θεοῦ στέμματα οὐκ ἐπαρκέσοι. (Another readig, ἐπαρκέσειεν, of inferior authority, is adopted by Bekker.) If ἐπαρκέσοι is retained (as it is by most editions), it can be explained only by assuming that Plato had in his mind μή οὐκ ἐπαρκέσει as the direct form. Μή final with the future indicative occurs in Aristophanes, Homer, and Theognis (see 324) ; there is therefore no remember that Plato is here paraphrasing Homer (Il. i. 25-28), but by no means literally. The Homeric line is Μή νύ τοι οὐ χραίσμῃ σκῆπτρον καὶ στέμμα θεοῖο (see 263).
日本語解釈